Court grants additional bail to ex-Minister Johnston Fernando
November 01, Colombo (LNW): In a recent ruling, the Colombo High Court has revoked the arrest warrant previously issued for former Minister Johnston Fernando, allowing his release on additional bail.
This decision was delivered on November 1 by Judge Manjula Thilakaratne during proceedings concerning a case brought forth by the Bribery Commission.
Johnston Fernando’s legal counsel, Kalinga Indatissa PC, explained that the former minister was unable to attend the court session on October 23 because he was providing a statement to the Criminal Investigation Department (CID) regarding an unregistered luxury vehicle purportedly linked to him, which had been discovered at a prestigious hotel in Colombo.
Despite this explanation, the judge expressed concern over the circumstances surrounding Fernando’s absence from court.
After considering the case details, the court determined that Johnston Fernando should be granted additional bail.
He was subsequently released on a cash bail of Rs. 25,000, supplemented by a personal surety of Rs. 1 million. The court has scheduled the next hearing for January 27.
The case against Fernando originates from allegations by the Bribery Commission, which filed charges in the Colombo Magistrate’s Court.
He, along with former CWE Chairman Eraj Fernando and former CWE Working Director Mohamed Shakeer, is accused of improperly employing 153 workers from Lanka Sathosa for political purposes during his ministerial tenure from 2010 to 2014.
This alleged misuse of resources has purportedly resulted in a significant financial loss to the government, estimated at around Rs. 40 million.
The implications of this case extend beyond individual accountability, highlighting broader concerns about the ethical conduct of public officials and the proper use of state resources.
As this legal matter unfolds, it remains a pivotal moment for the integrity of governance in Sri Lanka, raising questions about transparency and accountability in public service.
As the January hearing approaches, all eyes will be on the proceedings, which may have lasting ramifications for the individuals involved and for public confidence in the political system.
