The JVP-led National People’s Power (NPP) Government’s stewardship of Sri Lanka’s IMF-backed reform agenda is facing its first major test, as economic shocks triggered by Cyclone Ditwah force a reassessment of carefully negotiated fiscal and macroeconomic benchmarks under the $2.9 billion Extended Fund Facility (EFF).
Since assuming office, the NPP administration has largely adhered to the IMF’s reform framework, maintaining fiscal discipline, preserving debt sustainability, and avoiding policy reversals that could derail the program. Central Bank Governor Dr. Nandalal Weerasinghe has repeatedly emphasized that IMF programs are not rigid templates but adaptive frameworks that evolve with changing national circumstances. His recent remarks underline a key principle of IMF engagement: targets are set based on prevailing conditions and must be revised when those conditions shift.
That flexibility is now being tested. The unexpected devastation caused by Cyclone Ditwah disrupted economic activity, damaged infrastructure, and triggered emergency spending needs. As a result, the Government requested a postponement of the fifth EFF review originally scheduled for mid-December arguing that revised budgetary priorities and macroeconomic assumptions required additional assessment time.
The IMF accepted this position, approving $206 million in emergency financing under the Rapid Financing Instrument (RFI) in December 2025. This move allowed Sri Lanka to access quick liquidity without entering new debt restructuring talks, a clear signal that debt sustainability—lost during the 2020 COVID crisis has now been restored under the current reform trajectory.
An IMF fact-finding mission scheduled from January 22 to 28 will assess cyclone-related damage and determine how the shock has altered Sri Lanka’s macroeconomic outlook. IMF officials have already flagged rising risks, including a widening current account deficit of approximately $700 million and inflationary pressures exceeding earlier projections.
Critically, these developments do not represent a collapse of reform discipline but rather expose the fragility of recovery amid climate-related shocks. The NPP Government’s decision to seek IMF flexibility rather than abandon reform commitments suggests continuity rather than confrontation.
However, delays in completing reviews and revising targets also carry political and economic costs. Investor confidence, revenue-based fiscal consolidation, and inflation control will depend on how swiftly revised benchmarks are negotiated and implemented.
For now, the NPP Government remains broadly aligned with IMF conditions, but the coming months will determine whether adaptive policymaking can coexist with the discipline demanded by an IMF-supported recovery.
The post IMF Program under Stress as NPP Government Faces Reality Test appeared first on LNW Lanka News Web.
