US Settles USD 160 Million Payment Towards Nearly USD 4 Billion Debt to United Nations

The United States has made a payment of USD 160 million towards its nearly USD 4 billion debt to the United Nations. This payment is crucial for the UN's regular operating budget amidst warnings of financial collapse.

International

-Sathish Raman

Updated: Friday, February 20, 2026, 1:03 [IST]

The United Nations announced that the United States has contributed approximately USD 160 million towards its nearly USD 4 billion debt to the organisation. This payment is allocated for the UN's regular operating expenses, according to UN spokesperson Stephane Dujarric. The US still owes USD 2.196 billion for the regular budget, with USD 767 million due this year, and an additional USD 1.8 billion for peacekeeping operations.

UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres recently highlighted the urgent financial challenges facing the organisation. He stressed that without reforming financial rules or receiving dues from all 193 member countries, including the US, the UN risks financial collapse. This statement was particularly aimed at encouraging the US to fulfil its financial obligations.

US Financial Contributions and Arrears

The Trump administration's recent payment marks a step towards addressing its outstanding dues. However, it remains a small fraction of what is owed. Notably, 95% of the arrears to the UN's regular budget are attributed to the United States. This significant backlog underscores ongoing financial tensions between the US and the UN.

President Donald Trump has expressed dissatisfaction with the UN's performance, claiming it has not reached its full potential. His administration did not make any payments to the UN in 2025 and has withdrawn from several UN bodies, including UNESCO and the World Health Organisation, while also cutting funding to many others.

New Initiatives Amidst Financial Strain

The announcement of the US payment coincided with President Trump's first meeting of the Board of Peace. This new initiative is perceived by many as an attempt to challenge the UN Security Council's role in global conflict resolution. The timing suggests a strategic move by Trump amidst ongoing financial disputes with the UN.

Despite these efforts, Trump's administration continues to face criticism for its approach to international cooperation and funding commitments. The withdrawal from key organisations and reduced contributions have raised concerns about the US's role in global governance and its impact on international stability.

The ongoing financial issues highlight a broader debate about member states' responsibilities in supporting international institutions like the UN. As discussions continue, it remains crucial for nations to balance national interests with global commitments to ensure effective multilateral cooperation.

With inputs from PTI